Comments on: Jennifer Aniston loses her class.

By: smudgeruk

smudgeruk — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:50:38 +0000

Yes, anon, I agree that there is beauty in the naked body, and it’s nothing to be ashamed of.
I suppose the “class” aspect all comes down to her motives for posing. If it’s simply to boost her profile or plug the next product, then I find that a bit sad.
The closest analogy I can think of now is that if you walked into a bar and took your top off, you’d get plenty of attention from the men in there. But is that really the sort of attention you want? Wouldn’t you rather walk in there and earn attention and respect through your intelligence and your wit, as well as your tits?
Besides, if it’s an airbrushed image, it’s simply feeding the vision of the unattainable, and as such is completely fake…

By: anon

anon — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:13:05 +0000

I find the American attitude to nudity quite puritan to be honest.
A naked human body is a naked human body, it would have been classic art 200 years ago so why is it classless now?
Ok, this one has probably been airbrushed a bit but she looks beautiful and more importantly, healthy. She is a woman who obviously takes very good care of herself, I would have thought that was a positive thing?

By: smudgeruk

smudgeruk — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:33:38 +0000

Hmm. I think it’s ever-so-slightly insulting to her that everything she does is now seen through the filter of, “She lost a good-looking man, poor her”.
She could be buying some donuts to share with friends and the headline would read, “Poor Jen Resorts to Comfort Eating Over Brad split!!!”
You know, she’s a grown woman – if that’s what she wants to do, fine. But personally, I don’t find it particularly dignified, and I don’t think she even looks that comfortable posing…